Economics
1
Introduction to
Economics
University of
California, Berkeley
Fall 2018
Professor Martha
Olney
|
Midterm #1 from
previous terms
This is the first midterm
from Prof. Olney's Fall 2017 offering of Economics 1. The
exam was written as a 50 minute exam but administered
over 80 minutes.
Question 1 (18 points; 9 minutes) In 2009, the
European Union (EU) purchased 30,000 tons of butter from
European dairy farmers in order to maintain a minimum price that
the EU had established for butter.
A) (6 points) Draw a graph of the short-run
2009 butter market in the EU. Show the market equilibrium price
as p*, and the minimum price the government established as pm.
Show the market equilibrium quantity as q*, the quantity sold by
farmers as qf, and the quantity sold to consumers as qc.
B) (6 points) In the absence of the EU's
purchase, the butter market would have been in equilibrium. What
was the effect of the EU's purchase on consumer surplus in the
butter market? Explain your answer.
C) (6 points) On the graph you drew in part
(a), show the producer surplus if the market had reached
equilibrium by shading the appropriate area of the graph with
vertical hash marks |||. Show the producer surplus with
the EU's purchase by shading the appropriate area of the graph
with horizontal lines ≡. Explain why the EU's purchase of butter
changed producer surplus.
Question 2 (10 points; 5 minutes) This question is based on
article #8, "How Chicken Wings Explain Metro's Looming Ridership
Problems," by Powers (2017). The Metro in DC is very similar to
our Bart system, with the fare dependent upon the distance
traveled. The one difference between the two systems is
that the Metro charges higher fares during commute time than it
does during "off-peak" time.
Based on the factors that affect price elasticity of demand,
what are the likely short-run and long-run effects on total
revenue of an increase in DC Metro fares? In your answer,
distinguish between the effects of increasing fares during
commute time and during "off-peak" times.
Question 3 (25 points; 13 minutes) The U.S. Virgin Islands
(USVI) is a U.S. territory in the Caribbean. It produces two
outputs: tourism and rum. Rum can be made from sugarcane, which
grows in the islands.
A) (6 points) Draw a PPF for USVI, putting
tourism on the vertical axis and rum on the horizontal
axis. Label your PPF as "PPF1." Explain why you drew your
PPF with that particular slope and shape.
B) (6 points) USVI acquires new seaports that
accommodate large cruise ships carrying thousands of tourists.
What effect do the new ports have on USVI's PPF? Why? Show
the effect on your graph, using labels with subscripts "2."
C) (5 points) USVI pursues the gains from
trade. USVI trades with the mainland. Rum can be
manufactured anywhere. USVI has the comparative advantage in
tourism. For many years, demand for tourism is quite high and
USVI is operating on its PPF. On your PPF drawn above,
draw in a point and label it "C" to indicate where USVI
produces. Below, defend your choice.
D) (8 points) Hurricanes Irma and Maria
destroyed the beautiful sandy beaches and beachfront properties
that drew many tourists to USVI. Tourists stop coming to USVI.
Without outside aid, can USVI quickly go back to the standard of
living it had before the hurricanes? Would your answer be
different if USVI had not pursued the gains from trade?
Explain your answers.
Question 4 (19 points; 10 minutes)
You are an economist who is asked by the UCB administration to
analyze whether the $800,000 security expenditure on Sunday
September 24 was a good idea. You tell the administration you
first need to know three things
1. their goal
2. the counterfactual
3. the opportunity cost of
the funds
A) (10 points) Separately for each of these
three items, explain why you need that piece of information (the
goal, the counterfactual, the opportunity cost) in order to
provide your analysis.
B) (9 points) Think about the four causes of
disagreement discussed in article #1 by Fritz Machlup, "Why
Economists Disagree," published in 1965. For each of these
3 items (goal, counterfactual, opportunity cost), what is a
possible cause of disagreement? Defend your answers.
Question 5 (28 points; 14 minutes)
Consider the market facilitated by Airbnb: the market for
renting rooms by the night in houses and apartments
• Sellers are called
"hosts." They offer a room for rent. Hosts can be homeowners or
apartment leaseholders.
• Buyers are called
"guests." They pay hosts in order to rent a room for 1 night or
more in a house or apartment
• The price is the nightly
rent. The quantity in the market is “room-nights” which is the
sum of the number of nights each room is rented, summed over all
hosts.
A) (4 points) If the typical economic profit
earned by a host is 0, will anyone want to be a host? Explain.
B) (8 points) Assume the market for rented
rooms is perfectly competitive and is initially in long run
competitive equilibrium. Draw the relevant graphs below
for the market and for the typical host. Use subscripts
"1" on your labels.
C) (8 points) There is a change: The City of
San Francisco now requires all Airbnb hosts to pay a $125 fee to
the City each year. The fee must be paid regardless of the
number of room-nights sold. What is the SHORT RUN effect
of the new city fee on the price of a rented room in a house or
apartment? On the typical number of room-nights sold by a host?
On the typical profit of a host? On the market quantity of
room-nights sold? For each answer (increase, decrease, no
change), provide a one sentence defense. Show the effects on
your graph above, using subscripts "2" on your labels. (Help
yourself and your GSI by using a different color or dashes for
your curves in this part.)
D) (8 points) Relative to the short run
effects in part c, what are the LONG RUN effects of the new city
fee on price, room-nights sold by a typical host, profit of a
typical host, the number of hosts, and market quantity of room
nights sold? For each answer (increase, decrease, no change),
provide a one sentence defense. Show the effects on your
graph above, using subscripts "3" on your labels.
This is the first midterm
from Prof. Olney's Fall 2016 offering of Economics 1. The
exam was written as a 50 minute exam but
administered over 80 minutes.
Question 1 (22 points, 11 minutes) Let's
consider two parts of California as two separate economies: the
Central Valley and Silicon Valley. Suppose these economies
produce two products: agricultural products and industrial
products (including high tech and aerospace).
a. (8 points) Initially the two economies each
produce a mix of both goods: agricultural products (A) and
industrial products (I). Illustrate the production
possibilities of the Central Valley economy. Explain why
the PPF has the shape it does.
b. (7 points) The Central Valley has fertile
land and extensive irrigation systems delivering water to
farms. When the irrigation system was installed, it vastly
increased agricultural productivity. The Silicon Valley is
near two major universities whose graduates are some of the best
tech and data scientists in the country. The tech and data
scientists are constantly inventing new products and more
efficient ways to produce high tech and aerospace goods.
Over time everyone recognizes that the Central Valley has a
comparative advantage in the production of agricultural
products. Explain why the many fruit trees that once grew in the
Silicon Valley no longer exist.
c. (7 points) Which economy -- Central
Valley or Silicon Valley -- will grow faster over time?
Defend your answer.
Question 2 (10 points, 5 minutes) One candidate says: “The
crime rate fell after a particular policing policy was
implemented, which is evidence that the policing policy was
successful.” The other candidate says: “Wrong.” What
is a proper way to evaluate whether the policy was successful?
Question 3 (10 points, 5 minutes) Drawing on the article #5,
“How Scalpers Make Their Millions with ‘Hamilton’,” sketch a
model of supply and demand that shows why the price of scalped
tickets for the July 9 performance was so much greater than it
had been in May. Identify the forces that shifted demand and
those that shifted supply. In your answer, include enough
detail from the article that we know you read the article. (If
you didn’t read the article and you try to make stuff up, you’ll
earn fewer points than if you are honest and say “I didn’t read
it.”)
Question 4 (36 points, 18 minutes) Suppose that pizza is sold in
a perfectly competitive market
a. (8 points) Initially, the pizza industry is
in long-run competitive equilibrium. Draw the relevant
graphs below for the market and for the typical firm. Use
subscripts “1” on your labels.
b. (10 points) A new tax on pizza is
implemented: $2 per pizza that must be paid to the city. In the
short run, what happens to the price of pizza? To the
market quantity? To the quantity produced by the typical
firm? To the profit of the typical firm? Show the
effects on your graph above, using subscripts “2” on your
labels. (Help yourself and your GSI by using a different color
or dashes for your curves in this part.)
c. (10 points) In the short run, who will bear
the greater burden of the tax: buyers or sellers? Defend
your answer.
d. (8 points) In the long run, what happens in
the pizza industry? Specify the effects on market price,
market quantity, typical firm quantity, typical firm profit, and
the number of firms. Show the effects on your graph above,
using subscripts “3” on your labels.
Question 5 (10 points, 5 minutes) Suppose that sellers
could determine every individual buyer's willingness &
ability to pay for a product, and then charged each individual
that price. If you're willing and able to pay $10, you're
charged $10. If I'm willing and able to pay $2.25, I'm
charged $2.25. What can you say about the total consumer
surplus in that market?
Question 6 (12 points, 6 minutes) Compare two
manufacturing firms. One, Spacious Firm (SF) has a 10,000
square foot building with lots of machines. The machines are
arranged efficiently so that when additional workers are brought
into Spacious Firm, the workers can start producing output right
away. The other, Crowded Firm (CF) has a 2,000 square foot
building with the same number of machines as Spacious
Firm. The machines are crowded onto the factory floor in a
haphazard way. When additional workers are brought into
Crowded Firm, all workers are bumping into each other and the
total output of Crowded Firm only rises a small amount.
Label each of the marginal cost curves below with a label – SF
or CF – to indicate which MC curve best describes which
firm. Explain your answer. Your explanation should
include the concept of “diminishing marginal returns.”
This is the first midterm
from Prof. Olney's Fall 2015 offering of Economics 1. The
exam was written as a 50 minute exam.
Question 1 (20 points total; 9 minutes total)
Many tourists climb Mt Fuji in Japan, which is one of the
world’s highest mountains: over 12,000 feet or 3,700 meters
tall. Tourists can purchase water along the route at huts.
The higher a tourist climbs up the mountain, the higher is the
price of 1 liter of water. So a tourist pays more for 1 liter of
water at the 10,000' hut than at the 7,000' hut. Assume water
sellers on Mt. Fuji are profit-maximizers. And (even
though it’s unrealistic) assume perfect competition.
a. (5 points) Water sold at huts is
carried up the mountain by workers, not by vehicles.
Referring to the costs of production, explain why sellers would
charge a higher price for 1 liter of water at a higher
elevation.
b. (5 points) Most tourists bring their own
water, but drink it all before reaching the peak.
Referring to the demand for water, explain why sellers would
charge a higher price for 1 liter of water at a higher
elevation.
c. (10 points) We learn that more water is
sold at higher elevations than at lower elevations. Does
that information help you determine whether differences in
supply or differences in demand are primarily responsible for
the price differences? Explain. Supplement your answer
with a graph.
Question 2 (10 points; 4 minutes) Royal Dutch Shell is a
profit-maximizing company that produces and sells oil.
Last week, Shell announced it would immediately stop all
offshore oil drilling in the Arctic, even though it had already
spent $7 billion on the project. They stated that oil
prices were expected to remain low and future drilling costs
were expected to rise. Using economic terminology, explain
Shell’s decision to immediately stop Arctic drilling. In
your answer, be sure to indicate whether the $7 billion already
spent on the project is relevant to their decision.
Question 3 (40 points; 18 minutes total)
In Oregon, farms can grow apples or grapes. Grapes are
used to make wine. There are hundreds of small farms
growing grapes and producing wine. Assume the Oregon wine
industry is perfectly competitive.
a. (8 points) Initially, the Oregon wine
industry was in long-run competitive equilibrium. Draw the
relevant graphs below for the market and for the typical
firm. Use subscripts “1” on your labels.
b. (12 points) Oregon wine becomes much more
popular with consumers. In the short run, what happens to
the price of Oregon wine? To the market quantity? To
the quantity produced by the typical firm? To the profit
of the typical firm? Show the effects on your graph above,
using subscripts “2” on your labels.
c. (8 points) In the long run, what happens in
the Oregon wine industry? Specify the effects on market
price, market quantity, typical firm quantity, typical firm
profit, and the number of firms. Show the effects on your
graph above, using subscripts “3” on your labels.
d. (6 points) You can see the effect of the
increased popularity of Oregon wine as you drive through Oregon:
acres and acres of apple trees have been torn out, replaced with
acres and acres of grape vineyards. Each time 10 acres of
Oregon land is converted from apple orchards to grape vineyards,
does Oregon’s production of apples fall by the same
amount? Explain.
e. (6 points) Draw Oregon’s PPF (the two
outputs are apples and grapes). Illustrate two things in
one graph:
• your answer to part (c), the long-run
adjustment
• your answer to part (d), the effect on apple
production of converting apple orchards to vineyards
Briefly explain your graph.
Question 4 (30 points; 13 minutes) This question draws on the
three reader articles (#9a, 9b, 9c) about Uber.
a. (10 points) Taxi rides are sold at a fixed
price. The price does not fall or rise in response to
changes in demand. The graph at the right illustrates this
market. When is the fixed price a price ceiling: when
demand is low or when demand is high? When demand is high,
will taxi rides go only to the people with the highest ability
and willingness to pay? Explain.
b. (10 points) What is Uber’s “surge
pricing”? Use the model of supply and demand to illustrate
at right the market for Uber rides. In your graph,
distinguish between a low-demand time and a high-demand
time.
c. (10 points) When demand is high, is Uber
price-gouging? In your answer, distinguish between a
high-demand time such as Halloween or New Year’s Eve and a
high-demand time such as an unexpected closure of all public
transit (Bart, bus, etc.).
This is the first midterm
from Prof. Olney's Fall 2014 offering of Economics 1. The
exam was written as a 50 minute exam.
Question 1 (16 points total; 7 minutes total)
A. (8 points) Base your answers on the
articles #10a, "Where Car Is King, Smartphones May Cut Traffic,"
by Ian Lovett, New York Times, July 12, 2013 and #10b, "‘Bandit'
Cabs are Bad for Drivers and Passengers," by Veena Dubal, San
Francisco Chronicle, August 20, 2013.
Use a model of supply and demand to show in a graph the effect
of Lyft on the price of a taxi ride. Explain your
graph. Do both taxi drivers and Lyft drivers face the same
costs of providing a ride? In your answer, include enough
detail from the article so that we know you read the
articles. An answer that makes stuff up gets fewer points
than an answer which honestly states "I didn't read the
articles."
B. (8
points) Ride-sharing services charge a market price. Regulated
taxis charge a fixed price that does not change when demand
changes. In which case – with ride-sharing services or taxis –
is there more consumer surplus on evenings when demand is
high? Explain, supplementing your answer with a graph. We
have started the graph for you. (You don’t need to link your
answer to the reader articles.)
Question 2 (38 points total; 17 minutes total)
Selling bottled water outside the Cal football stadium requires
only bottles of water, ice, and a cooler that contains the ice
& bottles. The market is initially in long-run
competitive equilibrium with the typical seller earning zero
economic profit.
A. (6 points) The accounting profit from
selling bottled water is very low. Who is more likely to
sell bottled water: teenagers or corporate
executives? Defend your answer.
B. (7 points) It’s a hot day in Berkeley: the
temperature at game time will be 85̊. In the short run,
assuming all else is constant, what effect does the change in
weather have on the market equilibrium price of bottled
water? On the equilibrium quantity of bottled water
sold? Briefly explain your answers. (No graph here;
that will be in part c.)
C. (10 points) For the typical bottled water
seller in this perfectly competitive market, what is the
short-run effect of the change in weather on the
profit-maximizing quantity? What is the short-run effect
on profit? Supplement your answer with a graph. Use
subscripts "1" to show the initial (not hot day)
positions. Use subscripts "2" to label the curves, points,
and area that show the short-run effects of the hot weather.
D. (10 points) In the long run, what will
happen in the market for bottled water? What happens to
the profit-maximizing quantity and profits of the typical seller
of bottled water? Briefly explain. On your graphs
above, show the effects using subscripts "3" to label the
curves, points, and area that show the long-run effects.
E. (5 points) In this market, how long do you
think it will take to adjust to the new long run equilibrium:
hours, days, or weeks? Defend your answer.
Question 3 (24 points total; 11 minutes total)
Manuel owns two ice cream shops:
• one near a large urban
high school, on a street with four other shops selling sweet
treats
• one in a high-income
suburb, in a mall where Manuel has the only shop selling sweet
treats
A. (6 points) In which location – the urban
shop near the high school, or the suburban shop in the mall – is
demand for ice cream cones most likely to be relatively price
elastic? Give one reason for your answer.
B. (8 points) Manuel initially charges $2 per
ice cream cone. He wants to increase revenue. In which
location – the urban shop near the high school, or the suburban
shop in the mall – should he lower the price to $1? Defend
your answer.
C. (10 points) In both locations, a new tax of
25¢ per ice cream cone is implemented. In which location –
the urban shop near the high school, or the suburban shop in the
mall – will the consumer bear the larger burden of the
tax? Explain your answer. Draw a graph (or two, if
that is easier for you) that supports your answer.
Question 4 (22 points total; 10 minutes total)
Consider the Massachusetts (MA) economy in about 1800. Two
goods were produced: manufactured goods and farm goods.
• Because of its many
rivers and abundant timber, Massachusetts had high productivity
in manufacturing.
• Because of its rocky soil
& climate, Massachusetts had low productivity in food
production.
A. (4 points) Draw a production possibilities
frontier depicting the Massachusetts economy in about
1800. Put manufactured goods on the vertical axis &
farm goods on the horizontal axis. Label it “PPF1.” (No
words needed, just the graph).
B. (8 points) Many people moved to
Massachusetts from Europe in the early 1800s, increasing the
labor force. Would this result in symmetric or asymmetric
growth? Explain. Show the effect on your graph,
labeling it “PPF2.”
C. (10 points) Pennsylvania (PA) is nearby and
produced the same two goods.
• Transportation between
the two economies is relatively cheap.
• Manufacturing
productivity was about the same in Pennsylvania as in
Massachusetts.
• But because of
Pennsylvania’s very fertile soil and milder winters,
productivity in food production was much higher in Pennsylvania
than in Massachusetts.
Trade begins between Massachusetts and Pennsylvania. Will
there be gains from trade? Which economy will specialize
in manufactured good production? In food production?
Defend your answers.